From alex at acatysmoof.com  Mon May  1 09:56:52 2006
From: alex at acatysmoof.com (Alex Teslik)
Date: Mon May  1 09:57:03 2006
Subject: [Namazu-users-en] mknmz broken?
Message-ID: <20060501005013.M78352@acatysmoof.com>

I tried searching the lists, but didn't find this...

I upgraded my namazu to the latest namazu2-2.0.16 via FreeBSD ports. It was
working fine, but now mknmz is dying with this error:

[root]/home/alex/example.com/archive# /usr/local/bin/mknmz --check-filesize
--update=./search --output-dir=./search --template-dir=./search/templates ./html
Use of uninitialized value in split at /usr/local/bin/mknmz line 1149.
Use of uninitialized value in chdir at /usr/local/bin/mknmz line 1153.
Use of chdir('') or chdir(undef) as chdir() is deprecated at
/usr/local/bin/mknmz line 1153.
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
/usr/local/bin/mknmz line 1154.
Usage: mknmz [options] <target>...
Try `mknmz --help' for more information.

I opened up mknmz, but a quick glance didn't find the error. Ideas?

I did find a different error though - the line:

sub process_file ($$$$$$) {

should be:

sub process_file ($$$$$$$) {

The number of prototypes is wrong, based on what @_ gets assigned to in the
next line.

Thanks,
Alex

From yw3t-trns at asahi-net.or.jp  Mon May  1 12:47:43 2006
From: yw3t-trns at asahi-net.or.jp (Tadamasa Teranishi)
Date: Mon May  1 12:45:53 2006
Subject: [Namazu-users-en] Re: mknmz broken?
References: <20060501005013.M78352@acatysmoof.com>
Message-ID: <445584DF.6D1DBE37@asahi-net.or.jp>

Alex Teslik wrote:
> 
> I upgraded my namazu to the latest namazu2-2.0.16 via FreeBSD ports. It was
> working fine, but now mknmz is dying with this error:
> 
> [root]/home/alex/example.com/archive# /usr/local/bin/mknmz --check-filesize
> --update=./search --output-dir=./search --template-dir=./search/templates ./html

You are specifying --update option. 
Therefore, the index file should exist in ./search. 

Was --update option specified though the index did not exist in 
./search ?
Or, the index of ./search might be broken. 

Please execute mknmz once without --update option. 

> I did find a different error though - the line:
> 
> sub process_file ($$$$$$) {
> 
> should be:
> 
> sub process_file ($$$$$$$) {
> 
> The number of prototypes is wrong, based on what @_ gets assigned to in the
> next line.

Yes.
However, it doesn't relate to this case. 
-- 
=====================================================================
TADAMASA TERANISHI  yw3t-trns@asahi-net.or.jp
http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~yw3t-trns/index.htm
Key fingerprint =  474E 4D93 8E97 11F6 662D  8A42 17F5 52F4 10E7 D14E

From jpsp at megamail.pt  Thu May 11 17:49:46 2006
From: jpsp at megamail.pt (jpsp)
Date: Thu May 11 17:49:51 2006
Subject: [Namazu-users-en] question about multiple indexes -  ".namazurc"
Message-ID: <8868.193.136.44.30.1147337386.megamail@www.megamail.pt>

Hello all,

Is there any way to tell "namazu.cgi", on
the ".namazurc" configuration file,   to
search multiple indexes?

I'm using namazu to search mhonarc archives.
These archives have sub-archives, normally by
month.
Some archives are quite big, and "namazu"
is taking almost an hour each day do process
each of those big archives, even using the
update-index option. Maybe there's some optimization
than still can be done, but apart from that, the
natural solution seems to be having an index by
each monthy sub-archive, and telling "namazu.cgi"
to use these indexes, without the user having to
select all the archives on the HTML form

Thanks,
Jo?o Pagaime


From yw3t-trns at asahi-net.or.jp  Fri May 12 02:12:49 2006
From: yw3t-trns at asahi-net.or.jp (Tadamasa Teranishi)
Date: Fri May 12 02:13:24 2006
Subject: [Namazu-users-en] Re: question about multiple indexes -  ".namazurc"
References: <8868.193.136.44.30.1147337386.megamail@www.megamail.pt>
Message-ID: <44637091.1E3FDCD2@asahi-net.or.jp>

jpsp wrote:
> 
> Is there any way to tell "namazu.cgi", on
> the ".namazurc" configuration file,   to
> search multiple indexes?

The method of using two or more indices (64 or less) is being written 
here. 

http://www.namazu.org/doc/manual.html.en#form-idxnames

It only has to use two or more indices in default and to use "hidden"
for effective. 

ex.
 <input type="hidden" name="idxname" value="foo">
 <input type="hidden" name="idxname" value="bar">
 <input type="hidden" name="idxname" value="baz">
-- 
=====================================================================
TADAMASA TERANISHI  yw3t-trns@asahi-net.or.jp
http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~yw3t-trns/index.htm
Key fingerprint =  474E 4D93 8E97 11F6 662D  8A42 17F5 52F4 10E7 D14E

From jpsp at megamail.pt  Fri May 12 22:55:14 2006
From: jpsp at megamail.pt (jpsp)
Date: Fri May 12 22:55:21 2006
Subject: [Namazu-users-en] Re: question about multiple indexes - ".namazurc"
In-Reply-To: <44637091.1E3FDCD2@asahi-net.or.jp>
References: <8868.193.136.44.30.1147337386.megamail@www.megamail.pt>
	<44637091.1E3FDCD2@asahi-net.or.jp>
Message-ID: <10348.193.136.44.30.1147442114.megamail@www.megamail.pt>

Great!
Thanks for the answer. I did find that piece of information
about the HTML form, but didn't realize the "hidden"
proprety does the trick.
Meanwhile I've come up with a method that seems to take
much less time for "mknmz" to go over the monthy sub-archives.
The method is simple: instead of processing every day, all
the monthy sub-archives, just process the most recent two
sub-archives. There's no point anyway in going over the old
sub-archives because they are static. The trick, new to me,
is to use the "--no-delete" primitive of "mknmz" when
targeting the two most recent monthy sub-archives. I think
I'm off the hook because now "mknmz" is taking less than
a hour to run, instead of 2 hours, each isn't very practical
for my setup

Thanks again,
Jo?o Pagaime

> jpsp wrote:
>>
>> Is there any way to tell "namazu.cgi", on
>> the ".namazurc" configuration file,   to
>> search multiple indexes?
>
> The method of using two or more indices (64 or less) is being written
> here.
>
> http://www.namazu.org/doc/manual.html.en#form-idxnames
>
> It only has to use two or more indices in default and to use "hidden"
> for effective.
>
> ex.
>  <input type="hidden" name="idxname" value="foo">
>  <input type="hidden" name="idxname" value="bar">
>  <input type="hidden" name="idxname" value="baz">
> --
> =====================================================================
> TADAMASA TERANISHI  yw3t-trns@asahi-net.or.jp
> http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~yw3t-trns/index.htm
> Key fingerprint =  474E 4D93 8E97 11F6 662D  8A42 17F5 52F4 10E7 D14E
>
> _______________________________________________
> Namazu-users-en mailing list
> Namazu-users-en@namazu.org
> http://www.namazu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/namazu-users-en
>




From yw3t-trns at asahi-net.or.jp  Fri May 12 23:35:13 2006
From: yw3t-trns at asahi-net.or.jp (Tadamasa Teranishi)
Date: Fri May 12 23:35:49 2006
Subject: [Namazu-users-en] Re: question about multiple indexes - ".namazurc"
References: <8868.193.136.44.30.1147337386.megamail@www.megamail.pt>
	<44637091.1E3FDCD2@asahi-net.or.jp>
	<10348.193.136.44.30.1147442114.megamail@www.megamail.pt>
Message-ID: <44649D21.8F39EFCF@asahi-net.or.jp>

jpsp wrote:
> 
> Meanwhile I've come up with a method that seems to take
> much less time for "mknmz" to go over the monthy sub-archives.

It is user's freedom to the last which each directory to make the index. 

Namazu Project doesn't direct what index you make from MHonArc in 
any way. 

Those contents do not confirm Namazu Project at all though something 
to use Namazu on the MHonArc side seems to be prepared. 
Please inquire it of MHonARC when it is use. 
-- 
=====================================================================
TADAMASA TERANISHI  yw3t-trns@asahi-net.or.jp
http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~yw3t-trns/index.htm
Key fingerprint =  474E 4D93 8E97 11F6 662D  8A42 17F5 52F4 10E7 D14E

From vze26m98 at optonline.net  Mon May 22 21:57:06 2006
From: vze26m98 at optonline.net (Charles Turner)
Date: Mon May 22 21:57:15 2006
Subject: [Namazu-users-en] Index update trouble...
Message-ID: <r02010500-1039-7996AEB1E99211DAA1C5000D932C0D78@[192.168.1.24]>

Greetings-

I successfully built a namazu (2.0.14) index for a monharc database last
August, and now I'm updating the database. Things seemed to go well, but
now namazu can't find any results when I search.

The database is here:

<http://www.propheticdesire.us/microsound/msann-archive.html>

I added to the August indexes with the following command:

../../bin/mknmz --mhonarc --no-delete --output-dir=./indexes/msann-index
--replace='s#/home/.talita/vatic/propheticdesire.us/#http://www.
propheticdesire.us/#' ./html/ann-2005/2005-08/*.html

Namazu produced the following output:

Looking for indexing files...
73 files are found to be indexed.
1/73 -
http://www.propheticdesire.us/microsound/html/ann-2005/2005-08/maillist.
html is not a MHonArc message file! skipped.
1/72 -
http://www.propheticdesire.us/microsound/html/ann-2005/2005-08/msg00000.
html [text/html; x-type=mhonarc]
2/72 -
http://www.propheticdesire.us/microsound/html/ann-2005/2005-08/msg00001.
html [text/html; x-type=mhonarc]

(skipped...)

72/72 -
http://www.propheticdesire.us/microsound/html/ann-2005/2005-08/threads.
html is not a MHonArc message file! skipped.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2447, <GEN1649> line
2482.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2447, <GEN1649> line
3999.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2447, <GEN1649> line
3999.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2447, <GEN1649> line
7844.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2447, <GEN1649> line
7844.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2447, <GEN1649> line
7945.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2447, <GEN1649> line
8112.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2447, <GEN1649> line
8153.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2447, <GEN1649> line
10430.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2447, <GEN1649> line
12798.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2447, <GEN1649> line
12798.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2447, <GEN1649> line
13735.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2447, <GEN1649> line
16128.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2447, <GEN1649> line
16361.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2447, <GEN1649> line
18713.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2447, <GEN1649> line
18969.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2447, <GEN1649> line
20528.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2447, <GEN1649> line
22364.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2475, <GEN1649> line
27698.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2475, <GEN1649> line
27698.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2475, <GEN1649> line
27698.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2475, <GEN1649> line
27698.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2475, <GEN1649> line
27698.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2475, <GEN1649> line
27698.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2475, <GEN1649> line
27698.
Wide character in print at ../../bin/mknmz line 2475, <GEN1649> line
27698.
Writing index files...
[Append]
Date:                Mon May 22 04:49:25 2006
Added Documents:     71
Size (bytes):        426,216
Total Documents:     367
Added Keywords:      4,684
Total Keywords:      32,382
Time (sec):          10
File/Sec:            7.10
System:              linux
Perl:                5.008004
Namazu:              2.0.14

The previous version of Perl was 5.006001.

Trying a search (for the word "onda") from the Linux command line:

[pico]$ ../../bin/namazu -d onda indexes/msann-index
namazu(debug): NAMAZUNORC: ''
namazu(debug):  -n: 20
namazu(debug):  -w: 0
namazu(debug): query: [onda]
namazu(debug): Index name [0]: indexes/msann-index
namazu(debug): set_phrase_trick: onda
namazu(debug): set_regex_trick: onda
namazu(debug): query.tokennum: 1
namazu(debug): query.tab[0]: onda
namazu(debug): size of indexes/msann-index/NMZ.t: 1468
namazu(debug): before nmz_strlower: [onda]
namazu(debug): after nmz_strlower:  [onda]
namazu(debug): do WORD search
namazu(debug): size of indexes/msann-index/NMZ.ii: 129528
namazu(debug): l:0: !
namazu(debug): r:32381: ible
namazu(debug): searching: and
namazu(debug): searching: d:
namazu(debug): searching: dio?.
namazu(debug): searching: 
namazu(debug): searching: innipeg
namazu(debug): searching: @xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
namazu(debug): searching: 
namazu(debug): searching: ???????,
namazu(debug): searching: .
namazu(debug): searching: 
namazu(debug): searching: ???o???????
namazu(debug): searching: ???
namazu(debug): searching: 
namazu(debug): searching: ?????????????
namazu(debug): searching: ????????
Results:

References:  [ onda: 0 ] 

No document matching your query.

I've tried to garbage collect and rebuild the indexes to no avail. Now
I'm stumped. Any thoughts on how to proceed?

Best and thanks!

Charles Turner

<vze26m98@optonline.net>
From yw3t-trns at asahi-net.or.jp  Mon May 22 23:36:59 2006
From: yw3t-trns at asahi-net.or.jp (Tadamasa Teranishi)
Date: Mon May 22 23:37:12 2006
Subject: [Namazu-users-en] Re: Index update trouble...
References: <r02010500-1039-7996AEB1E99211DAA1C5000D932C0D78@[192.168.1.24]>
Message-ID: <4471CC8B.1457C5BE@asahi-net.or.jp>

Charles Turner wrote:
> 
> I successfully built a namazu (2.0.14) index for a monharc database last
> August, and now I'm updating the database. Things seemed to go well, but
> now namazu can't find any results when I search.

Use Namazu 2.0.16. 
The version before Namazu 2.0.15 should not be used. 
-- 
=====================================================================
TADAMASA TERANISHI  yw3t-trns@asahi-net.or.jp
http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~yw3t-trns/index.htm
Key fingerprint =  474E 4D93 8E97 11F6 662D  8A42 17F5 52F4 10E7 D14E

From darren at dcook.org  Mon May 29 08:11:37 2006
From: darren at dcook.org (Darren Cook)
Date: Mon May 29 08:11:54 2006
Subject: [Namazu-users-en] PHP5 module
Message-ID: <447A2E29.9080803@dcook.org>

I've used namazu on a couple of fairly big sites, from PHP4, using this
module:
  http://www.koderz.org/index.php?id=395

However this has not been updated in a long time (e.g. the install
example is for php 4.1.1 :-).

Is anyone working on a PHP5 module? Or does the above PHP4 module still
work in PHP5?

Darren
From knok at daionet.gr.jp  Mon May 29 17:38:48 2006
From: knok at daionet.gr.jp (NOKUBI Takatsugu)
Date: Mon May 29 17:38:51 2006
Subject: [Namazu-users-en] Re: PHP5 module
In-Reply-To: <447A2E29.9080803@dcook.org>
References: <447A2E29.9080803@dcook.org>
Message-ID: <87mzd1mdif.wl%knok@daionet.gr.jp>

At Mon, 29 May 2006 08:11:37 +0900,
Darren Cook wrote:
> Is anyone working on a PHP5 module? Or does the above PHP4 module still
> work in PHP5?

I'm not the author of the module, but I heard he stopped to develop
the module because of license issue (GPL vs BSDL ad clause).
-- 
NOKUBI Takatsugu
E-mail: knok@daionet.gr.jp
	knok@namazu.org / knok@debian.org